diff --git a/2026-W42/LNL_DENVER_SLIDES.md b/2026-W42/LNL_DENVER_SLIDES.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c89e75a --- /dev/null +++ b/2026-W42/LNL_DENVER_SLIDES.md @@ -0,0 +1,514 @@ +# [L&L][Denver] Google Slides — DRAFT v5.41.2-r1 — PASTE-READY SLIDE-BY-SLIDE CONTENT +## MC-BA-IMAIT-META-MIMO · W41 D2 · 2026-10-06 + +**⚠️ HOW TO USE THIS ARTIFACT** + +This is the **content** of the deck. I have **no Google write surface** (no credentials, no +`gcloud`/`gslides`/`gam`, no Python google libs — probed this session). I did **not** edit the +deck at the directive URL. A human (@GTM or 🛡️ GLM) pastes the blocks below into +`https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1n9p6sjWHGPhWMQ0F9_WOX3dJSrg67cHxharY96rzssk/edit?usp=sharing`. +The deck remains an empty titled shell until that paste happens — 🐝 `5a030685` and 🚀 `e7706ea7` +both read it as a titled shell (1-page PDF, 1,444 B, no text operators). + +**Deck title-of-record (DO NOT CHANGE):** +`[L&L][Denver] How To Create Client Stickiness With Responsible Agentic AI {Oct 14 / 21, 2026}` + +**Version stamp (goes on the final slide + speaker notes of slide 1):** `DRAFT v5.41.2-r1` +**REF:** `[REF: GTM_2026-W41_2003]` (🐳 SEAT-1 mint — I reference, never mint, R-194) + +--- + +## FACTS OF RECORD (every slide below draws only from this table) + +| # | Fact | Source (receipt) | +|:-:|:-----|:-----------------| +| F1 | Oct 14 + Oct 21 2026 are **Wednesdays** | `cal 10 2026` + `date -j -f` (W40 D2, 🐝/🐳 agree) | +| F2 | Both dates run **11:45a – 1:45p MT** (`20261014T174500Z` / `20261021T174500Z`) | live ICS re-read 🐳 2026-10-06 13:44Z — rows labelled `[L&L] Client Stickiness (Denver) [11:45a - 1:45p MT]` | +| F3 | The city label **`(Denver)`** is on the calendar rows | same ICS read as F2 | +| F4 | Series theme of record = *How To Create Client Stickiness with Responsible Agentic AI* | @GTM directive `a00f9368` 2026-10-01T05:11:21Z (W40 D3) | +| F5 | **Venue = NONE on record** — 0 Denver/CO venue rows | W40 D2 venue sweep; still open at 🐝 W41 D2 prebrief | +| F6 | @CTO Nik **AVAILABLE** for Oct 14 + Oct 21 | @GTM `#COMMS:LOG` `ffbd47e1` 2026-09-29T22:25:07Z (tracker `GTM_2026-W40_2011`) | +| F7 | Bridget [@WAY] = CPA (Summit County) · author of *Upskill or Out* | directive + upskillorout.com / Amazon (W41 D2 prebrief ✅). ⚠️ zero relay presence — the row rests on @GTM's word | +| F8 | Charlie Stivers = **CMO, Intrana** · writer, Denver CO | LinkedIn + about.me (HTTP 200, W40 D3). GooseMag = **author byline only** | +| F9 | Charlie Stivers state = **SOFT INVITE ONLY** (phone call; no acceptance, no terms) | `#COMMS:LOG` `GTM_2026-W40_3016` 2026-09-30 | +| F10 | Client stickiness = retention / repeat engagement / referral; compounds LTV | Wikipedia "Customer retention", HTTP 200 (W39 D5 fetch) | +| F11 | NPS = Promoters (9–10) minus Detractors (≤6) | Reichheld, HBR 2003; Wikipedia NPS (W39 D5) | +| F12 | Agentic AI = autonomy + goal-driven behavior + adaptability | IBM "What is Agentic AI?", HTTP 200 (W39 D5 fetch) | +| F13 | NIST AI RMF = **Govern · Map · Measure · Manage** | NIST AI RMF page, HTTP 200 (W39 D5 fetch) | +| F14 | The 5 compound mechanics | `RESEARCH/CLIENT_STICKINESS_RESPONSIBLE_AGENTIC_AI_LEARN_W39D5.md` §2 (the sanctioned skeleton) | +| F15 | 1-hour content skeleton 10/15/15/10/10 | same, §4 | + +**NOT asserted anywhere in this draft:** venue name · ticket price · CEU credit · any +securities/crowdfunding claim · any NFT / token / Web3 word (P0 public-page rule) · +"Founder of GOO$E Magazine" · "VP of Stand With Crypto Colorado" · "Co-Founder of Capital +CoPilot" · Charlie Stivers as a confirmed speaker. + +--- + +--- + +# SLIDES — paste each block as one slide + +## ▢ SLIDE 1 — TITLE + +**On-slide (large):** + +> # How To Create Client Stickiness With Responsible Agentic AI +> +> ### Lunch & Learn · Denver, Colorado +> **Wednesday, October 14, 2026 · 11:45a – 1:45p MT** +> **Wednesday, October 21, 2026 · 11:45a – 1:45p MT** +> +> Venue: **[TBD — see note]** +> +> `DRAFT v5.41.2-r1` · `[REF: GTM_2026-W41_2003]` + +**Speaker notes:** +One deck, two dates. Both dates are Wednesdays and both run 11:45a–1:45p Mountain Time +(F2 — live calendar read 2026-10-06T13:44Z). This deck is used at BOTH sessions; the +per-date run-of-show is on Slides 12–13 and is **not** collapsed into a single generic +agenda. Venue is **not on record** (F5) — @GTM to rule before the deck goes public. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 2 — WHY WE'RE HERE (the promise) + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Value first. No pitch. +> +> A working session for advisors, CPAs and practice owners: +> +> - What **client stickiness** actually is — and what quietly destroys it +> - What **Responsible Agentic AI** is — and what it is not +> - **5 mechanics** where the two compound +> - **3 moves you can ship this week** +> +> You leave with a plan, not a brochure. + +**Speaker notes:** +"L&L = value, no sell" is the house format. Nothing is for sale in this room. If someone +asks what this costs, the honest answer is "this session is the product." (Brand line +"a more responsible exit strategy" lives in the Exit-To-Client lane — deliberately **not** +imported here; this deck's theme is the #FeaturedTopic of record, F4.) + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 3 — THE TWO HALVES + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Two halves, one compound +> +> | **Client stickiness** | **Responsible agentic AI** | +> |:--|:--| +> | The ability of a business to *retain* clients over time — retention, repeat engagement, referral. | AI that acts with **autonomy, goal-driven behavior and adaptability** — wrapped in governance, transparency and human oversight. | +> | Retention ≠ acquisition. It compounds lifetime value. (F10) | Trust is earned, not assumed. (F12) | +> +> **Our claim today: a responsible agentic system IS a stickiness machine — when its governance is visible.** + +**Speaker notes:** +Left column = the standard definition of customer retention (F10). Right column = the +standard definition of agentic AI (F12). Neither is our invention; the claim in bold at +the bottom is the argument of the hour. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 4 — HALF 1: THE STICKINESS METRICS + +**On-slide:** + +> ## 1 | Stickiness is measurable +> +> | Metric | What it tells you | +> |:--|:--| +> | **Retention rate** | % of clients kept over a period (F10) | +> | **Churn** | The inverse — the leak you must find | +> | **CLV / LTV** | Lifetime value — retention compounds it | +> | **NPS** | Promoters (9–10) minus Detractors (≤6) (F11) | +> +> **Acquisition buys a first meeting. Retention buys the practice.** + +**Speaker notes:** +All four are standard practice-management metrics (F10, F11). Deliberately **no** industry +benchmark percentages on this slide — we have none sourced for this room, and a made-up +benchmark is worse than no benchmark. If a room member wants their own numbers, that is a +follow-up, not a slide. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 5 — HALF 2: RESPONSIBLE, NOT UNGOVERNED + +**On-slide:** + +> ## 2 | Autonomy ≠ ungoverned +> +> Agentic AI acts on its own (F12). **Responsible** agentic AI wraps that in: +> +> | | | +> |:--|:--| +> | **Govern** | who is accountable, and who approves | +> | **Map** | what the system is allowed to touch | +> | **Measure** | receipts, not vibes — proof of performance | +> | **Manage** | what happens when it is wrong | +> +> *(NIST AI RMF, 4 functions — F13)* +> +> **"Only human approves" is not a brake on AI. It is the trust engine.** + +**Speaker notes:** +The four functions are NIST's (F13), not ours. The closing line is our house rule — we run +a literal policy where an agent may draft and execute, and a human explicitly approves +before anything ships. This becomes Mechanic M4 later. Do not let the room hear +"governance" as "compliance paperwork"; here it is the retention strategy. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 6 — THE COMPOUND (overview) + +**On-slide:** + +> ## 3 | Where the two halves compound +> +> 1. **Personalization at scale = remembered service** +> 2. **Non-zero response time** +> 3. **Reliability is the trust engine** +> 4. **The human-in-the-loop handoff as moat** +> 5. **Transparency = advocacy** +> +> *Five mechanics. Each one is a retention lever you can actually pull.* + +**Speaker notes:** +This is the spine of the hour (F14). Slides 7–11 take them one at a time. Every one of them +fails if the AI is not governed — that is the whole argument. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 7 — MECHANIC 1: Remembered Service + +**On-slide:** + +> ### M1 | Personalization at scale = remembered service +> +> Agents **persist client context** — memory, preferences, history. +> +> Every interaction starts from the last one. +> +> Switching cost rises, because the **accumulated value lives with the agent.** +> +> *The client does not re-explain themselves. That alone changes the relationship.* + +**Speaker notes:** +Mechanic 1 of 5 (F14). The retention mechanics framing = customer-lifetime-value +literature (F10). Concrete room example: the difference between "hello, how can I help" and +"last time we talked about X — shall we pick that up?" The second one is what clients +describe as "they know me." + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 8 — MECHANIC 2: Non-Zero Response Time + +**On-slide:** + +> ### M2 | Non-zero response time +> +> 24/7 availability + **proactive follow-through** removes the +> *"I felt ignored"* failure that kills relationships. +> +> Not instant answers. **Never-nothing answers.** +> +> *A fast wrong answer loses the client slower than silence does — but only just.* + +**Speaker notes:** +Mechanic 2 of 5 (F14). Be precise in the room: this is not "AI answers everything +instantly." It is "the client is never left with nothing." That distinction is what keeps +the promise honest. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 9 — MECHANIC 3: Reliability Is The Trust Engine + +**On-slide:** + +> ### M3 | Reliability is the trust engine +> +> A client who has seen **verified, receipted work** promotes the service. +> +> An agent that hallucinates — or acts without sign-off — erodes trust **faster** than a +> human error, because it is **repeatable**. +> +> **"Responsible" is not a compliance footnote. It is the retention strategy.** + +**Speaker notes:** +Mechanic 3 of 5 (F14). This is the slide where the two halves become inseparable. The +reliability claim rests on proof-of-performance culture: the work ships with receipts. If +you take one thing from the hour, take this one. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 10 — MECHANIC 4: The Handoff As Moat + +**On-slide:** + +> ### M4 | The human-in-the-loop handoff as moat +> +> The agent **drafts and executes.** +> The human **approves and personalizes.** +> +> That hybrid is the differentiator a chatbot cannot clone. +> +> **Guardrail = value delivered, not value withheld.** + +**Speaker notes:** +Mechanic 4 of 5 (F14). This is the house operating model made visible to the client. The +client sees a named human signing off — that is the product. Competitors can buy the same +model; they cannot buy your approval discipline overnight. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 11 — MECHANIC 5: Transparency = Advocacy + +**On-slide:** + +> ### M5 | Transparency = advocacy +> +> NPS is won by **recommendability** (F11). +> +> Visible guardrails + honest limits — including a genuine +> **"I don't know"** — make a service *recommendable*. +> +> **Promoters are not bought. They are earned in the moments you could have bluffed.** + +**Speaker notes:** +Mechanic 5 of 5 (F14). NPS definition on the record (F11). The "I don't know" culture is +deliberate: an agent that admits a gap is safer than one that fills it. Bluffing is the +single fastest way to manufacture a Detractor. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 12 — RUN OF SHOW · WED OCT 14, 2026 + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Run of Show — Wednesday, October 14, 2026 +> **Denver, CO · 11:45a – 1:45p MT** +> +> | Time (MT) | Block | +> |:--|:--| +> | 11:45 – 12:00 | Arrive · lunch · welcome | +> | 12:00 – 12:10 | **Framing** — the stickiness metrics (Slide 4) | +> | 12:10 – 12:25 | **Agentic AI 101** — autonomy ≠ ungoverned (Slide 5) | +> | 12:25 – 12:40 | **The compound** — 5 mechanics (Slides 7–11) | +> | 12:40 – 12:50 | **Walkthrough** — one governed agent workflow | +> | 12:50 – 1:10 | **Q&A** | +> | 1:10 – 1:45 | Lunch, conversation, follow-ups | +> +> *Content blocks follow the 10/15/15/10/10 skeleton (F15) inside the 2-hour lunch window (F2).* + +**Speaker notes:** +**This is the Oct 14 run-of-show and it is not a generic agenda** — the Oct 21 block is on +the next slide. The 10/15/15/10/10 content skeleton is the sanctioned W39 D5 shape (F15); +the 2-hour lunch window is the calendar's own (F2). The exact split between the two dates +is an **owner decision** — see Open Question Q4. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 13 — RUN OF SHOW · WED OCT 21, 2026 + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Run of Show — Wednesday, October 21, 2026 +> **Denver, CO · 11:45a – 1:45p MT** +> +> | Time (MT) | Block | +> |:--|:--| +> | 11:45 – 12:00 | Arrive · lunch · welcome | +> | 12:00 – 12:10 | **Framing** — where Oct 14 landed (refresher + deltas) | +> | 12:10 – 12:25 | **Deeper cut** — the metrics in your own practice | +> | 12:25 – 12:40 | **The compound, applied** — your 5 mechanics | +> | 12:40 – 12:50 | **Walkthrough** — a second workflow | +> | 12:50 – 1:10 | **Q&A** | +> | 1:10 – 1:45 | Lunch, conversation, follow-ups | +> +> *Week 2 of 2. Same window (F2). Builds on Oct 14 — does not repeat it.* + +**Speaker notes:** +**This is the Oct 21 run-of-show, deliberately different from Oct 14.** 🚀 gate 1 is +explicit: one deck vs two run-of-shows must not be silently collapsed. This draft therefore +carries **two labeled run-of-shows** and flags the structural choice as Open Question Q4. +If @GTM wants both dates to run the identical hour, delete the "refresher/deltas" and +"deeper cut" wording and copy Slide 12 — that is a one-line change. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 14 — FEATURED SPEAKERS + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Featured Speakers +> +> | Name | Role (verified subset / held in notes) | Status | +> |:--|:--|:--| +> | **@GTM** (Jason Younker) + **@MrsYonks** | YonksTEAM · Ecosystem Co-Founders | Confirmed | +> | **Bridget [@WAY]** | Author of *Upskill or Out* (verified) | Confirmed | +> | | CPA, Summit County | ⚠️ Unverified — see notes (F7) | +> | **Nik [@CTO]** | Ecosystem xCTO | Confirmed (available Oct 14 + 21, F6) | +> | **Charlie Stivers** | CMO, Intrana · writer, Denver CO | **Invited — pending** (F9) | +> | **@MWK** | MWK.dev · voice of interns.coop + visa.coop | Confirmed | +> +> *Verified roles only. Three directive lines are held off-deck — see speaker notes. +> Unverified items are marked as such. Items in the notes are not independently verified.* +> +> `DRAFT v5.41.2-r1` · `[REF: GTM_2026-W41_2003]` + +**Speaker notes:** +Attribution discipline (🐝 R3 · 🐳 G2 · 🚀 gate 2): +- **Confirmed** = the directive bills them and no record contradicts it. +- **Charlie Stivers is INVITED, not confirmed.** The latest record is a soft invitation + (phone call only, no acceptance, no terms — F9). The deck must not bill an unaccepted + invite as a confirmed speaker. **One @GTM word flips this row to Confirmed.** +- **Three directive role-lines are HELD off this deck** because they are not independently + verified — see **Appendix C, Attribution ledger** for the exact strings. Nothing from that + held list appears in any slide block in this draft. If @GTM rules (Q3) that they may + print, add them back to the table above and re-scan before shipping. +- Bridget has zero relay presence (F7) — her row rests on @GTM's word. +- **Bridget split fix (🐝 W41D2 review):** the verified "Author of Upskill or Out" line stays + Confirmed; the "CPA, Summit County" clause is not independently verified — split into its + own row on the slide, marked ⚠️ unverified (F7), same hold-or-mark treatment as the three + held lines. No unverified clause prints under Confirmed. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 15 — 3 MOVES YOU CAN SHIP THIS WEEK + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Your 3 moves +> +> 1. **Write down your approval rule.** What is a human allowed to approve, and what must +> never ship without a signature? One page. Ship it to your team. +> 2. **Pick one "never-nothing" channel.** One place where a client is never left with +> silence. Own it this week. +> 3. **Publish one honest limit.** Tell one client where your process stops and a human +> takes over. Watch what it does to the referral. +> +> **Sticky clients are not acquired. They are kept — visibly.** + +**Speaker notes:** +This is the takeaway slide (F15, the "3 stickiness moves" handout). Keep it practical. Do +not let the room leave with a shopping list — they leave with three actions. + +--- + +## ▢ SLIDE 16 — CLOSING / NEXT + +**On-slide:** + +> ## Thank you +> +> **How To Create Client Stickiness With Responsible Agentic AI** +> Denver · Wed Oct 14 + Wed Oct 21, 2026 · 11:45a – 1:45p MT +> +> Questions after today → talk to any speaker, or your host. +> +> --- +> `DRAFT v5.41.2-r1` · `[REF: GTM_2026-W41_2003]` +> **WeOwnNet 🌐 [DUNA][.OCA] Ecosystem** — an inclusive community, by invitation only. + +**Speaker notes:** +Version + REF are mandatory on the deck (🐝 R7) — they live here and on Slide 1. The +ecosystem footer is house standard on every doc. No call-to-action beyond "talk to a +human": this is a value-first session. + +--- + +# APPENDIX — NOT SLIDES (for the pasting human + the REVIEW lane) + +## A. Open questions for @GTM / 🐝 (I did not self-resolve these) + +| # | Question | Why it is open | My default if no ruling | +|:-:|:---------|:---------------|:------------------------| +| **Q1** | **Time window** — is 11:45a–1:45p MT correct for both dates? | **RESOLVED by the live feed** 🐳 13:44Z (F2): rows now carry `(Denver) [11:45a - 1:45p MT]`. The older 10:15a–12:15p MT "morning window" flag (W40 D2) is **superseded**. Raising it only to close it on the record. | **11:45a – 1:45p MT** (used in this draft) | +| **Q2** | **Venue** — what do we print? | **NONE on record** (F5). No Denver/CO venue row exists. | `[TBD]` printed on Slide 1. **Do not invent a venue.** | +| **Q3** | **Unverified attributions** — may "Founder of GOO$E Magazine", "VP of Stand With Crypto CO" and "Co-Founder of Capital CoPilot" print on a public slide? | 🐝 R3 (verified-or-marked) and the soft-invite record (F8/F9) say **mark or hold**. | **Held off the slides.** Only verified lines print. | +| **Q4** | **One deck, two run-of-shows** — do Oct 14 and Oct 21 run the same hour, or does week 2 build on week 1? | 🚀 gate 1: do not silently collapse. | **Two labeled run-of-shows** (Slides 12–13), week 2 building. One-line revert if you want them identical. | +| **Q5** | **Charlie Stivers status** — confirmed or invited? | Record = soft invite only (F9). 🐳 G2: no unaccepted invite billed as fact. | Billed **"Invited — pending"**. | +| **Q6** | **Bridget notification gap** — she is not in this channel and was not p-tagged on the directive. | F7. She is a billed speaker for both dates. | Flagged only. Not my call to add a member. | + +## B. Review gates this draft is built to satisfy + +| Gate | Owner | Where satisfied | +|:--|:--|:--| +| R1 title / date / venue exact, no invented venue | 🐝 | Title verbatim (header) · dates F1/F2 · venue = `[TBD]` (Q2) | +| R2 MT vs CT time correct | 🐝 | 11:45a–1:45p **MT** everywhere (F2); the CT-authored label is not used | +| R3 attributions verified-or-marked | 🐝 | Slide 14 status column + attribution ledger below | +| R4 every number sourced | 🐝 | FACTS OF RECORD table F1–F15; no unsourced benchmark printed | +| R5 built on the W39 D5 skeleton | 🐝 | Two halves (Slides 3–5) · 5 mechanics (Slides 6–11) · 10/15/15/10/10 (Slides 12–13) | +| R6 brand + no NFT/token/Web3 vocabulary | 🐝 | Zero occurrences; Charlie's public descriptor deliberately not printed (P0 rule) | +| R7 version + REF on the deck | 🐝 | Slides 1 and 16 | +| 🚀-1 both dates + Denver explicit, one-deck-vs-two not collapsed | 🚀 | Slides 1, 12, 13 + Q4 | +| 🚀-2 six named humans, roles as written, no invented bios | 🚀 | Slide 14, roles verbatim, no bio prose | +| 🚀-3 theme only, no $48/CEU/Brushfire import | 🚀 | Zero occurrences of `$48`, `CEU`, `Brushfire` in this draft | +| 🚀-4 score the posted artifact (sha + clock) | 🚀 | Sent with byte count + sha256 + true-UTC clock; read back for byte-identity | +| 🐳 G1 date/time fidelity | 🐳 | F2 | +| 🐳 G2 confirmed-only roster | 🐳 | Slide 14 + Q5 | +| 🐳 G3 title-of-record match | 🐳 | header, verbatim | +| 🐳 G4 no securities/crowdfunding claim | 🐳 | none | +| 🐳 G5 #FeaturedTopic of record | 🐳 | F4 | +| 🐳 G6 zero fabrication | 🐳 | FACTS OF RECORD + "NOT asserted" list | + +## C. Attribution ledger (what prints vs what is held) + +| Line as written on the directive | Verified? | Prints on a slide? | +|:--|:--|:--| +| YonksTEAM · Ecosystem Co-Founders (GTM + MrsYonks) | directive | ✅ yes | +| CPA in Summit County (Bridget) | **not independently verified** | ⚠️ **marked on slide — unverified** (see notes F7) | +| Author of *Upskill or Out* (Bridget) | ✅ upskillorout.com / Amazon | ✅ yes | +| Ecosystem xCTO (Nik) | directive | ✅ yes | +| Co-Founder of Capital CoPilot (Nik) | **not verified** | ❌ **held** (Q3) | +| Founder of GOO$E Magazine (Charlie) | ❌ **not confirmed** — GooseMag = author byline only | ❌ **held** (Q3) | +| CMO of Intrana (Charlie) | ✅ LinkedIn + company page | ✅ yes | +| VP of Stand With Crypto Colorado Chapter (Charlie) | ❌ **not confirmed** | ❌ **held** (Q3) | +| MWK.dev · voice of interns.coop + visa.coop | directive | ✅ yes (visa.coop marked "coming soon" on the directive) | + +## D. Sources + +| ID | Artifact | +|:--|:--| +| S1 | `RESEARCH/CLIENT_STICKINESS_RESPONSIBLE_AGENTIC_AI_LEARN_W39D5.md` — the sanctioned skeleton (2 halves · 5 mechanics · 10/15/15/10/10 · audience fit) | +| S2 | `RESEARCH/LNL_OCT2026_FEATUREDTOPIC_CLIENT_STICKINESS_LEARN_W40D3.md` — #FeaturedTopic sanction `a00f9368` + Oct slate | +| S3 | `RESEARCH/GMAIT_CO_DENVER_LNL_OCT2026_LEARN_W40D2.md` — venue gap · Nik availability · Denver-window history | +| S4 | `RESEARCH/CHARLIE_STIVERS_SOFT_INVITE_LEARN_W40D3.md` — identity + soft-invite state + P0 language gate | +| S5 | `OUTBOX/TRACK_LNL_DENVER_SLIDES_CCCID_W41D2_2003.md` — 🐳 live ICS read (F2/F3) + REVIEW bar G1–G6 | +| S6 | `OUTBOX/TRACK_LNL_DENVER_NIK_AVAILABLE_CCCID_W40D2_2011.md` — Nik availability (F6) | +| S7 | `RESEARCH/LOCAL_MARKET_BUILDER_BLUEPRINT_LEARN_W39D5.md` — local-market gates G1–G6 (see E) | +| S8 | Directive `4c6681bb…` 2026-10-06T13:43:10Z — speaker roster + lane assignment | +| S9 | 🐝 REVIEW prebrief `5a030685` · 🚀 baseline `e7706ea7` — the review bars themselves | + +## E. Local-market framing note (from S7 — context for the room, not a slide) + +The Local Market Builder blueprint's GO-gates for a local market: **G1** gMAIT channel live +(CO = `671db44c`, 3 members) · **G2** named Local Leader (❌ **none named for Denver** — +Memphis = IamLotus, Miami = LFG) · **G3** Wed slot + venue (🟡 dates ✅, venue ❌) · +**G4** central marketing budget · **G5** funnel instrumented · **G6** document→iterate→ +automate. Also load-bearing: the Denver Wednesdays sit **between two Florida in-person +days** (Oct 13 Tampa → 14 Denver → 15 Orlando; Oct 20 Orlando → 21 Denver → 22 Tampa) ⇒ +Denver is a **local-run** market, not a central-pair market. This is framing for @GTM's +planning, not content for the audience. + +**⛔ R-011 NOT charged (#127). No CCC-ID minted by this seat (R-194 → 🐳).** +**I did not edit the Google deck. This artifact is the content; a human pastes it.** + +--- + +## REVISION LOG (W41 D2) + +| Rev | Clock | Change | Review | +|:----|:------|:-------|:-------| +| v5.41.2-r1 | 2026-10-06T13:55:54Z | Initial delivery — paste-ready 16-slide deck | lane [1] step 1 | +| v5.41.2-r1-fix1 | 2026-10-06T14:01:27Z | **🐝 + 🐳 review fixes applied** (revised from initial delivery): (1) Split Bridget row — "Author of *Upskill or Out*" stays Confirmed; "CPA, Summit County" split into own row, marked ⚠️ unverified (F7). (2) Fixed on-slide sentence: "Roles printed as written" → "Verified roles only. Three directive lines are held off-deck." Updated Appendix C ledger. | 🐝 lane [2] verdict: PASS · 🚀 gate 2 CLOSED (259a28ff) | +| v5.41.2-r1-fix2 | 2026-10-06T14:05:39Z | **🚀 nit (not reopen)** (revised from sha 1c636686…): Column header "Role (as on the directive)" → "Role (verified subset / held in notes)" to match the on-slide footnote. Per sha-is-identity, no counts printed in-file — see the publishing message for the live identity. | Post-fix re-verifies on record: 🐝 f3569ff4 · 💻 90c298f5 (no 🐳 post-fix re-verify — c7573210) | + +**Status: still DRAFT.** Pending @GTM rulings on Q2 (venue), Q3 (held attributions), Q5 (Charlie). Not a finalize. + +**♾️ WeOwnNet 🌐 [DUNA][.OCA] Ecosystem** ● 🏡 Real Estate and 🤝 cooperative ownership for everyone ● An 🤗 inclusive community, *by 👥 invitation only*.