5.0 KiB
status, type, edition, vertical, title, authors, recipe_ids, last_updated
| status | type | edition | vertical | title | authors | recipe_ids | last_updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| draft-for-review | chapter-template | 2026 |
|
2026-08-31 |
Chapter structure (for review)
This is the blank chapter, matching PRD §5.4 (locked 2026-08-31). Review the shape before anyone writes a real vertical.
How to use it. Copy this file to workflows/[vertical-slug].md (example: workflows/real-estate.md). Replace XX with the vertical prefix. Leave this file as the blank.
What a chapter is. A substantial essay for one vertical. Full workflows sit inside the argument, at the point they earn, not in an appendix and not as a stack of cards.
What a workflow is. The unit of practice. Read it, run the Try-it (~15 min), share the result. That Try-it is what counts as activation.
Rules that do not move.
- Skip-to-Try-it at the top. Activation does not wait for the essay.
- Safeguards before Method. Data handling is read before anyone pastes a client list.
- Method shows real tool output, not a description of it.
- Nested recipes stay open. Do not hide Method behind "click to reveal."
- Every recipe has a stable ID and a heading it can link to.
- No chatbot on the page. No crypto or Web3 language.
- PDF must match this stack: essay + in-place recipes.
Vertical prefixes
| Vertical | Slug | ID prefix |
|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | real-estate |
RE |
| Financial Advisors | financial-advisors |
FA |
| Fractional C-Suite | fractional-c-suite |
CS |
| Higher Ed | higher-ed |
HE |
| Communities | communities |
CM |
| Technology | technology |
TE |
Fill every [bracket]. Two nested recipes are shown so the essay-wraps-workflow pattern is obvious. Add more at the points in the argument they belong. Delete the unused slot rather than leaving a hollow block.
[Chapter title]
[Vertical] · 2026 edition · [Author names]
What this chapter is for
[One short promise. The job this vertical's reader is trying to get done this week, and what they will be able to run by the end of the chapter.]
Skip to a Try-it: XX-01 · XX-02
[Essay: the stakes]
[Why this work is hard here. Specific to the vertical, not a generic AI preamble. Name the actual failure: a listing that stalls, a client file that leaks, a committee that will not move.]
[Essay: constraints]
[What you cannot ignore in this vertical. Tools people already use. Compliance, clients, time. What "done" looks like for them.]
[Essay: how we work here]
[The practice this chapter argues for. Then the first workflow, at the moment the argument needs proof.]
[Job title. This is the workflow title, written as the job.]
XX-01 · v0.1 · ~[N] min · ~$[cost or "free with tools you already have"]
Problem
[The real task. One job, not a category.]
Actors
- Who runs it: [role]
- Who is affected: [client, student, team]
- What the model is allowed to do: [draft / classify / retrieve]. What a human must still do: [send / approve / file]
Setup
- Tools: [named tools, versions if it matters]
- Sample files: [what we ship with this recipe, or "use the anonymized packet below"]
- Cost: [model/tool cost if known. If unknown, say so.]
Safeguards
Read this before the steps.
- Data handling: [what never goes into the prompt. What is ok if stripped.]
- Human oversight: [the checkpoint before anything leaves the building]
- Failure modes: [how this goes wrong in this vertical]
- Escalation: [who you call, and when you stop]
Method
Ordered steps. Paste the actual tool output inside the step that produced it. A screenshot or a quoted block beats a paraphrase.
- [Step]
[real output] - [Step]
- [Step]
Evidence
[What "it worked" looks like. An artifact, a number, a before/after. Not "the user felt more confident."]
Try it (~15 min)
- Sample data: [what they use so they do not need a live client]
- What to produce: [the artifact]
- Done when: [a check they can mark. Completing this is activation.]
Share the result
[What they post: the outcome, not the workflow text. Point at the community template when it exists. Events, not content.]
Author: [name] · Sources: [links or citations] · Last updated: [date]
[Essay continues]
[The argument picks back up. What the first recipe proved, what it did not. Then the next workflow, when the next claim needs proof.]
[Second job title]
XX-02 · v0.1 · ~[N] min · ~$[cost]
Problem
[ ]
Actors
[ ]
Setup
[ ]
Safeguards
[ ]
Method
Evidence
[ ]
Try it (~15 min)
[ ]
Share the result
[ ]
Author: [name] · Sources: [ ] · Last updated: [date]
Further workflows in this vertical
Sources
[Chapter-level sources. Recipe-level citations stay on the recipe.]
Last updated: 2026-08-31